It’s Twilight all over again.How many times have I heard that in the two years since The Hunger Games came out? Too many too count. And I have to say, it continues to baffle me: These novels could not be more different. Stephenie Meyer’s is more of a traditional romance (populated, I grant you, by some pretty untraditional characters); while Suzanne Collins’ is a tale of war and survival.Read more here.
Is it that both books star unforgettable women? I suppose you could say that in the most sweeping and general sense, Katniss Everdeen and Bella Swan are alike: Both have cores of steel. They know what they want, and they aren’t going to back down. But for me, any similarity ends there.
Saturday, September 25, 2010
EW: Why ‘The Hunger Games’ isn’t the new ‘Twilight’
It seems the media likes to group all successfuly young adult novels together, no matter how different they may be. Just that has happened since Twilight blew up huge a couple of years ago, getting constant comparisons to a very different series of books: Harry Potter. Well, now everyone insists that The Hunger Games is the new Twilight. Neither does EW.com’s Tina Jordan. Here is her reasoning:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment